Code Reference
StructuralASCE 7-22

Section 12.3.3/Horizontal Structural Irregularities

ASCE 7-22 Section 12.3.3 and Table 12.3-1 define five types of horizontal structural irregularities that trigger additional seismic design requirements.

What this section requires

Table 12.3-1 identifies five types of horizontal (plan) irregularities. Type 1a (Torsional Irregularity): exists when the maximum story drift at one end of the structure exceeds 1.2 times the average drift of the two ends. Type 1b (Extreme Torsional Irregularity): the ratio exceeds 1.4. Type 2 (Re-entrant Corner): exists when both projections of the plan beyond a re-entrant corner exceed 15% of the plan dimension in that direction. Type 3 (Diaphragm Discontinuity): exists when the diaphragm has an abrupt change in stiffness, including a cutout exceeding 50% of the enclosed diaphragm area. Type 4 (Out-of-Plane Offset): exists when a lateral force-resisting element is offset from the element below. Type 5 (Nonparallel System): exists when lateral force-resisting elements are not parallel to or symmetric about the major orthogonal axes. Irregularities trigger additional requirements including three-dimensional analysis, increased forces on collectors and connections per overstrength combinations, and potentially prohibition of certain seismic systems in higher SDCs.

Why this section exists

Buildings with irregular plan configurations concentrate seismic forces at specific locations, creating stress patterns that the equivalent lateral force procedure may not capture without explicit adjustments. Torsional irregularity causes the building to twist during an earthquake, concentrating drift and forces at the corners farthest from the center of rigidity. Re-entrant corners create stress concentrations at the notch. Diaphragm discontinuities reduce the ability of floors to distribute lateral forces. Out-of-plane offsets create force transfer problems where the load path shifts between stories. The irregularity checks force designers to identify these conditions and apply appropriate analysis and detailing.

What plan reviewers look for

Plan reviewers check the floor plan geometry for re-entrant corners and diaphragm openings. They check the lateral system layout for torsional irregularity by comparing the center of rigidity to the center of mass. They check for offsets in the lateral system between floors. For vertical irregularities, they perform a parallel check. They verify the structural calculations explicitly address each applicable irregularity and apply the required additional provisions.

Common violations

Torsional irregularity not checked
An L-shaped building with lateral bracing concentrated on two walls does not include a torsional irregularity check. The asymmetric bracing layout likely creates torsional irregularity, requiring accidental torsion amplification and potentially three-dimensional dynamic analysis.
Re-entrant corner not identified
A building with a plan projection exceeding 15% of the plan dimension does not identify the re-entrant corner irregularity. The diaphragm connections and collector forces at the re-entrant corner must be designed for increased forces.
Compliance tip
Include an irregularity check table in the structural calculations listing each of the five horizontal irregularity types with the applicable parameter and whether the irregularity exists. If present, note the additional requirements triggered (increased forces, 3D analysis, prohibited systems). Show the check on the structural general notes.
Callout automatically checks your drawings against ASCE 7-22 and 43+ other building codes and standards. Each finding includes the exact section reference, severity rating, and suggested resolution.
Try it with 50 free credits

Related sections

12.8.1Seismic Base ShearASCE 7-222.3.6Load Combinations Including Overstrength FactorASCE 7-2212.3.2Vertical Structural IrregularitiesASCE 7-22

Related articles

7 ASCE 7 Load Violations That Structural Plan Reviewers Catch First