Code Reference
ElectricalIEEE 1584-2018

Section 6/Incident Energy Calculation

IEEE 1584 Section 6 covers incident energy calculation at the working distance using electrode configuration equations.

What this section requires

The incident energy calculation determines the thermal energy (cal/cm2) a worker would be exposed to at a specified working distance from an arc flash event. The 2018 edition uses empirical equations derived from extensive testing and replaces the simplified Lee method with equations covering three electrode configurations: vertical conductors in a box (VCB), vertical conductors in open air (VCBB), and horizontal conductors in a box (HCB). Inputs include the bolted fault current, the gap between conductors, the working distance, the enclosure size, and the arc duration (determined by the protective device clearing time).

Why this section exists

The incident energy value determines the minimum arc rating of PPE that a worker must wear. An underestimated incident energy leads to inadequate PPE and severe burns. An overestimated value leads to excessive PPE that reduces worker dexterity and increases heat stress. The 2018 IEEE 1584 equations are based on over 1,800 arc flash tests across a range of voltages, currents, and configurations, providing more accurate results than the previous 2002 edition, especially for equipment with enclosures (panelboards, switchgear, MCCs).

What plan reviewers look for

Plan reviewers check that the arc flash study uses the correct IEEE 1584 edition and electrode configuration for each piece of equipment. They verify the bolted fault current at each location against the short-circuit study. They check the protective device clearing times from the coordination study. They verify the working distance assumption (typically 18 inches for panelboards, 24 inches for switchgear, 36 inches for MCCs).

Common violations

Wrong electrode configuration selected
The arc flash study uses the open-air (VCBB) configuration for equipment that is enclosed (panelboards, switchgear). Enclosed equipment concentrates the arc energy and produces higher incident energy values than open-air configurations.
Clearing time does not match coordination study
The arc flash study assumes instantaneous trip clearing but the coordination study shows the upstream device clears in 0.5 seconds due to a time-delay setting. The longer clearing time significantly increases the incident energy.
Compliance tip
Coordinate the arc flash study with the short-circuit study and the protective device coordination study. Use the correct electrode configuration for each equipment type. Document the working distance assumption. Verify protective device clearing times under the actual fault current at each location, not the device's instantaneous rating.
Callout automatically checks your drawings against IEEE 1584-2018 and 43+ other building codes and standards. Each finding includes the exact section reference, severity rating, and suggested resolution.
Try it with 50 free credits

Related sections

130.5Arc Flash Risk AssessmentNFPA 70E4Arc Flash Hazard Calculation ModelIEEE 1584-20188Arc Flash BoundaryIEEE 1584-2018